AI, Deafness and the Future of Choice
- Tim Scannell
- Aug 13
- 3 min read
Over the past few months, I've been exploring the relationship between artificial intelligence, accessibility and Deaf communities.
My journey so far has included:
Blog 1: Accessibility Is Not an Add-On – Why accessibility should be built in from the beginning, not added afterwards.
Blog 2: The Communication Preference Layer – A vision where accessibility follows the person, not the device.
Blog 3: The Sign Language AI Manifesto – A set of principles for building sign language AI with trust, transparency, respect and Deaf leadership at its heart.
Those blogs have focused mainly on communication.
But recently, I found myself thinking about a much bigger question.
A presentation that stayed with me
I recently watched a presentation by a Deaf speaker in France about AI and Deaf Cure.
It was an interesting combination of topics.
Artificial intelligence is rapidly changing the world around us, while advances in medicine and genetics may one day make new treatments for some types of hearing loss possible.
Both topics have huge implications for Deaf communities.
During the presentation, both AI and Deaf Cure were discussed.
But when the presentation ended, and the audience began asking questions, I noticed something.
Almost every question was about AI.
Very few, if any, were about Deaf Cure.
That observation stayed with me.
Why?
I don't know the answer.
Perhaps AI feels more immediate because it is already becoming part of our daily lives.
Perhaps Deaf Cure feels further away.
Or perhaps the audience, many of whom appeared to be Deaf, found AI easier to discuss than the idea of a Deaf cure.
For some Deaf people, the word "cure" is not simply a medical term.
It raises questions about language, identity, culture and belonging.
For others, medical advances that restore hearing may be a welcome option.
These perspectives are different, but they can both exist.
Perhaps that is why the conversation is so difficult.
AI is changing more than communication
Until now, much of my writing has focused on sign language AI.
How should AI learn sign languages?
Who owns sign language data?
How do we build AI that Deaf people can trust?
But AI is increasingly becoming part of healthcare.
It can analyse medical data.
It can speed up research.
It can help identify patterns that humans might miss.
One day, it may even contribute to treatments for some types of hearing loss.
That makes this conversation about much more than technology.
Choice must remain with people
The question is not whether AI is good or bad.
The question is who remains in control.
If AI helps create new medical options, that should be welcomed by those who want them.
If someone chooses not to pursue those options, that choice deserves equal respect.
AI should expand human choice.
It should never quietly decide what a successful life should look like.
Deaf voices matter
If AI begins influencing the future of hearing loss research, Deaf people must be part of those conversations.
Not simply as participants.
Not only after decisions have already been made.
But as equal partners helping shape the future.
That includes Deaf people with many different perspectives.
Some may welcome future medical treatments.
Others may not.
Both voices deserve to be heard.
A conversation worth having
Watching that presentation made me realise something.
We are already having conversations about AI.
Perhaps now it is time to have equally open conversations about AI and Deaf Cure.
Not because everyone must agree.
But because the future should never be shaped without the people whose lives will be affected.
My previous blogs explored how AI can respect sign language.
This blog asks a different question.
As AI becomes more powerful, how do we make sure it respects human choice as much as human intelligence?
I don't have all the answers.
But I think it's a conversation worth starting.
Comments